Service Format
Problem
Your team already sees value in AI, but a normal chat does not scale: data is copied manually, response format drifts, and quality is hard to control.
Solution
I build a controlled LLM pipeline for the task: OpenAI API or local models, n8n/API integrations, structured output, quality checks, and fallback scenarios.
Result
A repeatable process for documents, spreadsheets, requests, or content without manual copy-paste and with clear quality control rules.
Timeline
After the brief, we take a test sample, validate quality on real data, then run the full volume and define support rules.
Collaboration Format
You describe the task and provide sample data → we align quality criteria → I run a pilot → we scale the pipeline to production volume.
Start with the brief
How It Works in Practice
AI is useful for business when it becomes part of a workflow: accept input data, process it by rules, check quality, and return the result in the required format.
When This Is Relevant
- You need to process many texts, spreadsheets, requests, documents, or product records.
- A normal LLM chat already helps, but manual copying and result checking consume the benefit.
- You need a controlled pipeline with logs, repeatability, quality checks, and clear economics.
- You need to choose between OpenAI API, local models, or a hybrid setup based on data and budget constraints.
What I Do in the Project
- I design the processing scenario: inputs, rules, response format, checks, and manual control points.
- I connect LLMs through OpenAI API, local models, or a hybrid setup depending on the task.
- I build automation in n8n, scripts, or API integrations with your spreadsheets, CRM, bots, and internal services.
- I configure structured output, JSON schemas, retry/fallback logic, and quality gates for problematic fragments.
What You Receive
- A working AI/LLM pipeline for a specific business process.
- A test run on real data with agreed quality criteria.
- Documented prompt, validation, error-handling, and scaling logic.
- Stack recommendations: OpenAI API, local models, n8n, OCR, translation, extraction, and data normalization.
We usually start with a small sample, not a large rollout. This quickly shows where LLM saves time, where human review is needed, and where classic data processing is still the better tool.
Service Materials and Case Studies
2026-04-04
How order picking verification was automated: an employee sends invoice and product photos, OpenAI compares them and returns a structured JSON conclusion, and the Telegram bot returns the result per item.
Read material
2026-04-03
A practical PoC of fully automated EN->RU translation with Qwen 2.5 32B on Mac: CPU mode was too slow, GPU mode was production-viable, with quality control for problematic chunks.
Read material
2026-04-02
A practical DeepSeek OCR 2 test on a maritime charter book: many headings, links, and footnotes, with final assembly into a single LaTeX file.
Read material
2026-01-06
I automated translation of 3,000 route names and descriptions from Excel into Russian using n8n and OpenAI, with intermediate quality checks, preserved file structure, and staged execution (test, 500 rows, full run).
Read material
2026-01-02
A case study about building a list of city districts across Russia: I first expected a single SQL query against "КЛАДР", then tried "ГАР" (a ~50 GB archive with download and unpacking constraints), and ultimately deli...
Read material
Discuss a similar task